select.parts
Comparison

IGX T7000 vs IGX Orin 700: GPU architecture, CUDA cores and memory

Asked as: “Compare the IGX T7000 and IGX Orin 700 based on GPU architecture, CUDA cores and memory.”

Answered by the Rapidflare agent · graded correct in Rapidbench v0.0.2

The IGX T7000 uses a newer GPU architecture, more CUDA cores and twice the memory of the IGX Orin 700. Both are IGX board kits.

GPU architecture, CUDA cores and memory nvidia.com +1nvidia.com ↗“IGX Thor MicroATX board kit”nvidia.com ↗“IGX Orin MicroATX board kit”

AttributeIGX T7000IGX Orin 700
FamilyIGX ThorIGX Orin
GPU architectureBlackwellAmpere
GPU CUDA cores2,5602,048
Tensor coresNot listed64
Memory128 GB LPDDR5X64 GB LPDDR5 with ECC
Memory bandwidth273 GB/sNot listed

What's different

  • GPU architecture: The T7000's built-in GPU is Blackwell, and the Orin 700's is Ampere. Both kits can also take a separate (discrete) GPU. For the T7000, the listed options are the RTX PRO 6000 or RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell. nvidia.comnvidia.com ↗“dGPU support (RTX PRO 6000 or 5000 Blackwell)”
  • CUDA cores: The T7000 has 2,560 and the Orin 700 has 2,048.
  • Memory: The T7000 has 128 GB of LPDDR5X at 273 GB/s. The Orin 700 has 64 GB of LPDDR5 with ECC. I couldn't find a memory bandwidth figure for the Orin 700. Peak performance (listed in different precisions, so the numbers can't be compared directly): nvidia.comnvidia.com ↗“64GB LPDDR5 with ECC”
  • IGX T7000: up to 5,581 FP4 TFLOPS (sparse). nvidia.comnvidia.com ↗“up to 5581 FP4 TFLOPS (sparse)”
  • IGX Orin 700: up to 1,705 TOPS. nvidia.comnvidia.com ↗“up to 1705 TOPS”

For more detail, see the NVIDIA IGX product page and the IGX Thor datasheet.

Sources

  1. IGX T7000 nvidia.com