select.parts
Comparison

Jetson AGX Thor vs IGX Thor Developer Kit: Ethernet speed, SFP ports and FP4 performance

Asked as: “For a surgical robotics team choosing a dev platform, how do the Jetson AGX Thor Developer Kit and IGX Thor Developer Kit compare on Ethernet speed, SFP ports and FP4 performance?”

Answered by the Rapidflare agent

The IGX Thor Developer Kit comes out ahead on all three: faster Ethernet (200GbE vs 25GbE), twice as many SFP-type ports (2 vs 1) and about 2.7× the FP4 throughput (5581 vs 2070 FP4 TFLOPS).

Jetson AGX Thor Developer Kit vs IGX Thor Developer Kit developer... +3developer.nvidia.com ↗“io.sfp_ports=1, io.max_ethernet_speed=25GbE”developer.nvidia.com ↗“performance.max_fp4_tflops=2070 TFLOPS”nvidia.com ↗“io.sfp_ports=2, io.max_ethernet_speed=200GbE”nvidia.com ↗“up to 5581 FP4 TFLOPS (sparse)”

Jetson AGX Thor Developer KitIGX Thor Developer Kit
Max Ethernet speed25GbE200GbE
SFP ports12 (2x QSFP112 200GbE via ConnectX-7)
FP4 performance2070 FP4 TFLOPSUp to 5581 FP4 TFLOPS (sparse)

About these figures:

  • Ethernet / SFP: The IGX kit gets its 200GbE ports from a ConnectX-7 adapter with 2x QSFP112 cages. nvidia.comnvidia.com ↗“ConnectX-7 (2x QSFP112 200GbE)”
  • FP4, IGX: The IGX figure includes the pre-installed RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q dGPU. It is a sparse figure. Power is 40–130 W for the IGX T7000 board kit, plus up to 300 W for the dGPU. nvidia.com +1nvidia.com ↗“pre-installed RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q dGPU”nvidia.com ↗“Power 40-130 W TMP for the IGX T7000 board kit, up to 300 W for the dGPU”
  • FP4, Jetson: The Jetson kit's 2070 FP4 TFLOPS comes from its Jetson AGX Thor T5000 module. I couldn't find whether that figure is sparse or dense, so the two FP4 numbers may not be measured the same way. developer...developer.nvidia.com ↗“Jetson AGX Thor T5000 (Blackwell, 2070 FP4 TFLOPS, 128GB)”

Other differences that may matter for surgical robotics:

Sources

  1. Jetson AGX Thor Developer Kit developer.nvidia.com
  2. IGX Thor Developer Kit nvidia.com