select.parts
Comparison

FRAMOS FSM-IMX565C-000-V1A vs FSM-IMX568C-000-V1A: resolution, pixel pitch and interface

Asked as: “Compare FSM-IMX565C-000-V1A and FSM-IMX568C-000-V1A on resolution, pixel pitch and native data interface.”

Answered by the Rapidflare agent

Here's the comparison of the two FRAMOS Image Sensor Modules on the three attributes you asked about:

AttributeFSM-IMX565C-000-V1AFSM-IMX568C-000-V1A
Resolution4128 × 3008 pixels2472 × 2064 pixels
Pixel pitch2.74 µm (width) × 2.74 µm (height)2.74 µm (width) × 2.74 µm (height)
Native data interfaceMIPI CSI-2 (2 / 4 Lane)MIPI CSI-2 (2 / 4 Lane)

framos.com +3framos.com ↗“3008}”framos.com ↗“2064}”framos.com ↗“2.74}”framos.com ↗“sensor_module.native_data_interface=MIPI CSI-2 (2 / 4 Lane)”

Key differences:

  • Resolution is the only differing attribute of the three: the FSM-IMX565C-000-V1A offers 4128 × 3008 pixels, while the FSM-IMX568C-000-V1A offers 2472 × 2064 pixels — the IMX565C module delivers the higher pixel count. framos.com +1framos.com ↗“3008}”framos.com ↗“2064}”
  • Pixel pitch is identical on both: 2.74 µm square. framos.comframos.com ↗“2.74}”
  • Native data interface is identical on both: MIPI CSI-2 with 2 or 4 lane options. framos.comframos.com ↗“sensor_module.native_data_interface=MIPI CSI-2 (2 / 4 Lane)”

Both are Color modules from the same FRAMOS Image Sensor Modules family, and both require a host and, where applicable, a separate interface adapter. framos.com +1framos.com ↗“sensor_module.chromaticity=Color”framos.com ↗“Requires a host and, where applicable, a separate interface adapter”

Sources

  1. FSM-IMX565C-000-V1A framos.com
  2. FSM-IMX568C-000-V1A framos.com