select.parts
Comparison

e-con Systems e-CAM56_CUONX vs e-CAM25_CUONX: sensor, resolution and shutter type

Asked as: “How do the e-CAM56_CUONX and e-CAM25_CUONX compare on sensor, resolution and shutter type?”

Answered by the Rapidflare agent

Both are e-con Systems camera kits for Jetson Orin NX and Orin Nano, both with global shutter and a MIPI CSI-2 interface — the main differences are the sensor and resolution.

e-CAM56_CUONX vs e-CAM25_CUONX e-consyste... +3e-consystems.com ↗“Global-shutter camera kit using an IMX568 sensor”e-consystems.com ↗“Global-shutter camera kit using an AR0234 sensor”e-consystems.com ↗“2064}”e-consystems.com ↗“1200}”

Attributee-CAM56_CUONXe-CAM25_CUONX
SensorSony IMX568onsemi AR0234
Resolution2472 × 2064 (~5.1 MP)1920 × 1200 (Full HD, 1080p)
Shutter typeGlobal ShutterGlobal Shutter
InterfaceMIPI CSI-2MIPI CSI-2
Supported Jetson familiesJetson Orin NX, Jetson Orin NanoJetson Orin NX, Jetson Orin Nano

Summary:

  • Sensor: the e-CAM56_CUONX uses an IMX568, while the e-CAM25_CUONX uses an AR0234. - Resolution: the e-CAM56_CUONX is higher resolution at 2472 × 2064 pixels, versus 1920 × 1200 on the e-CAM25_CUONX. e-consyste... +1e-consystems.com ↗“2064”e-consystems.com ↗“1200” e-consyste... +1e-consystems.com ↗“camera.sensor_model=IMX568”e-consystems.com ↗“camera.sensor_model=AR0234”
  • Shutter type: identical — both use a global shutter, which makes both suitable for capturing fast-moving subjects without motion artifacts. e-consyste... +1e-consystems.com ↗“camera.shutter_type=Global Shutter”e-consystems.com ↗“camera.shutter_type=Global Shutter”

If you need the extra pixel count for finer detail, the e-CAM56_CUONX is the higher-resolution option; the e-CAM25_CUONX delivers Full HD at what is typically a simpler integration point.

Sources

  1. e-CAM56_CUONX e-consystems.com
  2. e-CAM25_CUONX e-consystems.com